Prompt-ready context
Receive bounded Markdown designed to sit immediately before the user’s question in a model request.
Christian context layer · Retrieval for AI
Christian AI grounding gives a language model relevant Scripture and theological sources before it generates an answer. Feason returns a prompt-ready context block plus separate citation, provenance, token-usage, and tradition-coverage metadata.
https://www.feason.com/api/context/v1/contextualizeHow it works
Receive bounded Markdown designed to sit immediately before the user’s question in a model request.
Keep citation objects separate from generated prose and verify quotations against immutable corpus releases.
Requested, represented, and missing traditions stay explicit so retrieval gaps cannot masquerade as consensus.
API example
The REST response mirrors the same versioned Christian source corpus available through Feason’s MCP server. Every evidence item retains its passage ID, canonical reference, source provenance, and verification status.
See all six API operations →POST /contextualizecurl https://www.feason.com/api/context/v1/contextualize \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $FEASON_CONTEXT_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"query": "How did early Christians speak about grace?",
"traditions": ["catholic", "orthodox", "reformed"],
"maxTokens": 2000
}'application/json{
"corpusVersion": "theology-v7.0.0",
"context": "# Feason Context\n...",
"citations": [{ "label": "E1", "passageId": "..." }],
"coverage": {
"representedTraditions": ["catholic", "orthodox"],
"missingTraditions": ["reformed"]
},
"usage": { "estimatedTokens": 1842, "truncated": false }
}Feason Context sits between your application and its language model. Your service sends a theological question, Feason retrieves relevant passages from a curated corpus, and the contextualize endpoint formats the strongest evidence within the requested source and token limits. The model remains interchangeable because the context contract is provider-neutral.
Christian questions often require more than a list of verses. The corpus connects Scripture with creeds, councils, patristic writings, historical works, confessions, theological terms, and documented tradition positions. Each category stays visible, allowing an application to distinguish primary text from later interpretation.
Feason does not ask a model to average Christian traditions into one anonymous position. Disputed claims remain attributed, areas of agreement and disagreement remain separate, and missing coverage is reported as a corpus limitation—not as proof that a tradition has no teaching.
Use cases
Place inspectable evidence behind conversational answers without locking the product to one model provider.
Connect a question to Scripture, historical context, theological terms, and named interpretive positions.
Build source-backed briefs, editorial research tools, and citation-aware drafting workflows.
Questions
Christian AI grounding supplies a model with retrieved Scripture and theological sources before it answers. Feason packages exact passages, provenance, citations, tradition coverage, and caveats into a bounded context block that can be placed directly in a model prompt.
No. Grounding happens at request time and does not require retraining a model. Your application retrieves a versioned evidence package from Feason and gives that package to the model alongside the user’s question.
Yes. The contextualize and evidence-packet operations accept requested traditions. The response reports which requested traditions are represented and which are missing from the retrieved evidence.
Every included passage has a stable passage ID and provenance. The citation verification endpoint can compare a passage or quotation against an immutable corpus release and report exact, normalized, hash-only, or mismatch status.
Feason Context · REST API 1.2