Ground answers
Christian AI grounding
Turn a question into model-ready context drawn from Scripture, creeds, councils, historical theology, and named Christian traditions.
ContextualizeSearchFeason Context · REST API 1.2
Give an AI application inspectable Scripture, historical sources, named theological perspectives, and citations it can verify. Feason retrieves the evidence. Your product decides how to use it.
https://www.feason.com/api/context/v1/contextualizeExplore the platform
Ground answers
Turn a question into model-ready context drawn from Scripture, creeds, councils, historical theology, and named Christian traditions.
ContextualizeSearchTest assertions
Separate supporting, contradicting, qualifying, contextual, and unclassified evidence without treating silence as disagreement.
Evaluate claimResearch deeply
Search exact passages or assemble a structured research packet with positions, provenance, historical context, caveats, and confidence.
SearchEvidence packetShow your work
Verify quotations against an immutable release and expose the corpus version behind every answer your application produces.
Verify citationManifestQuickstart
Send the user’s question with a prompt budget. The response’s context field can be placed directly before the question in your model input. Citation metadata remains separate and inspectable.
POST /contextualizecurl https://www.feason.com/api/context/v1/contextualize \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $FEASON_CONTEXT_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"query": "How did early Christians speak about grace?",
"traditions": ["catholic", "orthodox", "reformed"],
"maxTokens": 2000,
"maxSources": 12
}'application/json{
"corpusVersion": "theology-v7.0.0",
"context": "# Feason Context\n...",
"citations": [{ "label": "E1", "passageId": "..." }],
"coverage": {
"representedTraditions": ["catholic", "orthodox"],
"missingTraditions": ["reformed"]
},
"usage": { "estimatedTokens": 1842, "truncated": false }
}Claim checking
Feason matches the wording to a curated claim definition, retrieves relevant passages, and groups only human-annotated stances. Your interface can show the evidence behind each category instead of presenting an unexplained verdict.
POST /evaluate-claimcurl https://www.feason.com/api/context/v1/evaluate-claim \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $FEASON_CONTEXT_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"claim": "Children of believers may be baptized.",
"limitPerStance": 5
}'application/json{
"normalizedClaim": "infants-may-be-baptized",
"supportingEvidence": [],
"contradictingEvidence": [{ "passageId": "..." }],
"qualifyingEvidence": [{ "passageId": "..." }],
"contextualEvidence": [],
"unclassifiedEvidence": [],
"confidence": 0.92,
"negativeEvidencePolicy": "Only explicitly opposing annotations..."
}REST surface
/api/context/v1/contextualizeOne call returns a token-budgeted evidence block, stable citation labels, and explicit tradition coverage.
/api/context/v1/evaluate-claimGroup retrieved passages by curated stance, with explicit caveats and no false negative inference from silence.
/api/context/v1/searchRun lexical, semantic, or hybrid retrieval over the versioned corpus with source and tradition filters.
/api/context/v1/evidence-packetRetrieve Scripture, primary sources, historical context, positions, provenance, caveats, and confidence.
/api/context/v1/verify-citationCheck a passage or exact quote against an immutable corpus release snapshot.
/api/context/v1/manifestRead the active corpus version, source counts, relationships, claims, and verification distribution.
Developer access
Product boundary
Every included passage carries a stable ID, reference, provenance URL, license, and verification status.
Differences are named and sourced. Missing corpus coverage remains visible instead of becoming synthetic consensus.
The context block respects the requested budget and reports when evidence was omitted or shortened.
Questions
A Christian context API retrieves relevant Scripture and theological sources for an application. Feason returns exact passages, provenance, citations, named tradition coverage, and explicit caveats so AI-generated answers can be inspected.
Yes. The REST API returns provider-neutral JSON and prompt-ready Markdown. Applications can use the context with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, open-source, or other language models.
No. Feason is non-denominational and source-grounded. Disputed views are attributed to their sources and traditions, while missing corpus coverage is reported instead of treated as absence of teaching.
Signed-in Feason members can create scoped, read-only developer keys. Each key expires after 90 days, can be revoked, and cannot access a member’s private study context.