Typical workload
- Guided instruction
- 23 hours
- Required reading
- 36 hours
- Lesson practice
- 60 hours
- Artifacts
- 30 hours
- Feedback and revision
- 24 hours
Follow a clear path through the central questions of Christian theology. Each chapter begins with one question, guides you through four lessons and their sources, then asks you to form a response of your own. The scholarship is advanced; every step is explained.
Doctrine is half of what you leave with. Virtues are gained by practice, so each one below names the habit the coursework asks of you chapter after chapter until it becomes yours.
The guided pages are only one part of the work. This is an advanced, non-credit course with primary-source reading, sustained writing, evidence records, AI feedback, and revision.
Course guidance is open to browse. A Feason account is required before assessed work so synced drafts, reading traces, assessment attempts, AI feedback, optional course feedback, and completion evidence can be retained. This includes attempts that need revision; only accepted attempts count toward completion.
Each chapter has three required readings; other sources are optional. Some assigned books require a library or an edition you already own. Every dossier states the access route before work is assigned.
Feason uses formative AI review against visible criteria. Source locators, quotation or precise paraphrase, warrants, and conditions for revision are required; citation checkboxes alone do not count as evidence. The reviewer does not inspect the learner’s edition independently, so quotation accuracy remains the learner’s responsibility.
The server-verifiable receipt records completion only. It is not faculty grading, academic credit, licensure, ordination, endorsement, or a degree.
The 2026.2 lessons are AI-authored and structurally audited. Cross-tradition theologian review, disability-led accessibility review, and a five-learner usability pilot remain explicit release-readiness gates. Feason does not represent those reviews as complete until named evidence is recorded.
Every lesson, source dossier, and chapter judgment contributes evidence toward these course-level outcomes.
Interpret Scripture and primary theological sources in their historical, canonical, and ecclesial settings
Reconstruct major doctrinal disagreements in language their strongest advocates could recognize
Compare Eastern, Catholic, Protestant, evangelical, Anabaptist, Pentecostal, and contextual perspectives without erasing their differences
Construct theological judgments with explicit warrants, textual evidence, objections, and practical consequences
Evaluate how doctrine distributes authority, shapes communities, and affects harmed or excluded people
Revise a theological claim when stronger evidence, argument, or testimony requires correction
Start with the next chapter below, or open a course section to see what it contains.
How Scripture, Israel, tradition, reason, and experience become disciplined theological judgments rather than competing authorities.
What distinguishes dogmatic judgment from history of religions, biblical studies, philosophy, or private conviction?
How can Christians read Israel’s Scriptures christologically without erasing their historical sense or Jewish particularity?
When is tradition a truthful reception, and when is it an instrument of exclusion?
Divine naming, attributes, Trinity, creation, and providence across classical and modern disputes.
How can finite language refer truthfully to the incomprehensible God?
How does Christian confession name real distinction without partition and unity without modal collapse?
What can creation ex nihilo mean in a world marked by evolutionary death, creaturely agency, and catastrophic suffering?
Human creaturehood and sin, the identity and work of Jesus Christ, grace, participation, justification, and liberation.
What work does the language of person and nature perform, and where does it remain underdetermined?
How do the biblical metaphors of victory, sacrifice, reconciliation, representation, and liberation relate?
What has sin damaged in human creaturehood, and how does grace heal and perfect agency without erasing it?
The Spirit’s work, the church’s contested forms, sacramental life, mission, public witness, and last things.
How does the Spirit constitute and disrupt the church’s visible forms?
How can the church be a public sign of reconciliation without confusing its action with God’s reign?
How does Christian hope address death, judgment, historical trauma, and the renewal of creation?
See the size of the cohort without publishing who is studying theology.
Loading the cohort count…
“Not mastery of a system, but learning to ask better questions: patient before texts, candid about difference, careful in reasoning, and responsible for what follows.”Begin with chapter 1.1